Link copied
By Abhishek Vishnoi and Winnie Hsu
(Bloomberg) -- Optimism for a quick resolution of the conflict in the Middle East is rapidly ebbing in financial markets.
What just days ago was a tentative wait-and-see trade has flipped into something far more decisive: investors are pricing in a deeper and longer-lasting supply shock — one that could squeeze growth while reigniting inflation. The selling means that about $6 trillion of market value has now been erased from global stocks since war in Iran began.
Most Read from Bloomberg
Although equities trimmed declines and oil pared gains after the Financial Times reported that Group-of-Seven countries will discuss a possible joint release of petroleum from reserves, Monday’s market moves were still striking.
The shift gathered pace after President Donald Trump said parts of Iran had yet to be attacked and that $100 crude was “a very small price to pay” for “Safety and Peace,” undercutting hopes the conflict would be relatively contained.
As crude surged toward $120 a barrel, traders said it became clear the market was no longer positioned for a short confrontation. Brent crude spiked as much as 29% intraday — its biggest swing in almost six years — while measures of equity volatility jumped and trading volumes across Asian exchanges ran well above monthly averages. The price action bore the hallmarks of capitulation rather than caution.
“The pendulum is swinging toward panic,” Danny Wong, chief executive officer of Areca Capital said by phone. “There is a stampede to sell or pare all kind of risk assets.”
As markets opened across time zones on Monday, key technical levels fell in quick succession in equities, bonds and major currencies. Haven demand lifted the dollar, while energy shares advanced. At one point, Asian equities tumbled about 5.6%, their steepest drop since April. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index extended its advance.
“Investors have had to increase their probability of the worst-case scenario,” said Rajeev de Mello, a global macro portfolio manager at Gama Asset Management. “The challenge is the stagflationary nature of the shock.”
One trigger for the selloff was the news of further attacks on the energy infrastructure by both sides, which raised the prospects of a lasting supply shock. Iran named the son of the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as its new supreme leader, a defiant move by the Islamic Republic.
“I thought I was going to get some sleep this week, but not anymore,” said Matthew Haupt, a hedge fund manager at Wilson Asset Management. “Investors are now bracing for a long winter. The risks are firmly placed to the downside from here with no clear timeline of an end to it.”
In Japan, one of the first markets to open, some trading floors reported internal communication systems straining under the volume of client inquiries.
There’s “heightened tension” on the floor, said Katsuji Azuma, head of equity sales division at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co.
Foreign investors pulled $14.2 billion from emerging Asian stocks excluding China last week, the largest withdrawal since at least 2009, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The selling has centered on semiconductor-heavy South Korea and Taiwan, markets that had become key destination for global AI-related investment.
Volatility gauges tied to Japan’s Nikkei 225 and India’s NSE Nifty 50 jumped as much as 62% and 23%, respectively, to their highest levels since mid-2024. In South Korea, the slump briefly triggered a trading halt.
“When markets encounter a black swan, everything could fall at the same time,” said Anna Wu, a cross-asset investment strategist at Van Eck Associates in Sydney. “That’s what we’re seeing today — selling across every corner from equities to bonds and currencies, except for oil and dollar.”
The MSCI Asia Pacific Index is now within roughly 1% of a technical correction, while the MSCI Emerging Markets Index is nearing the same threshold, underscoring the intensity of the global risk-off shift.
Part of the decline reflects how far markets had run. South Korea and Taiwan had climbed to multi-year highs on insatiable demand for AI chips, leaving valuations stretched and investors sitting on sizable gains. The oil shock has compounded the pressure, highlighting Asia’s vulnerability to energy disruptions, particularly in the Middle East.
A significant share of the region’s crude and liquefied natural gas imports passes through the Strait of Hormuz, now at the center of the conflict. China, India and Indonesia rank among the world’s largest oil importers, while South Korea and Taiwan — reliant on gas-fired power and Gulf supply chains — are especially exposed.
“I am raising cash levels because if the Middle East crisis continues for a long time, the probability of economic recession or stagflation will inevitably increase,” said Hironori Akizawa, a fund manager at Tokio Marine Asset Management.
Governments across the region are scrambling to cushion the blow. South Korea and Taiwan are weighing market-stabilization measures to stem equity losses and exploring ways to cap domestic fuel costs as energy prices surge.
In a sign of global inflation concerns, traders have been pulling back on US rate cuts and pushing bets for a deeper easing in monetary policy into next year should a slowdown materialize. Investors have pushed back expectations for the Fed’s next quarter-point rate cut to September. At the end of February, before the war erupted, traders had fully priced in a move by July. Some bond options traders are now betting the Fed may not cut rates at all this year.
Read: Yardeni Raises Odds of US Market Meltdown to 35% on Iran War
The geopolitical shock is also colliding with another growing concern: whether the peak of the artificial-intelligence capital-expenditure cycle is near. Signals from major technology companies on the durability of AI infrastructure spending are facing heightened scrutiny as the macro outlook darkens.
“People are going defensive,” said Jun Bei Liu, co-founder and lead portfolio manager at hedge fund Ten Cap Investment Management. “Markets are now trying to grasp how long this war could last and what it means for global growth if oil remains at these levels.”
--With assistance from Gabrielle Ng, Ruth Carson, Marcus Wong and Momoka Yokoyama.
Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek